In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Newdays, according to the drastically growth in the population in the world, with the consequence that demands level of this people for food, energy, land and such things have increased, supply of this demands needs to the steady and serious effort in the most of jobs. Although, both of high accuraty and spending less time for doing works is very important, some people prefer to do their responsibilities only in less time even without enough accurately, but others prefer do their works in high accurate even if take far more time. When it comes to me, I certainly, would follow those value much more to the latter compared to the former. Some of the my outstanding reasons for this choice are elaborated in detail in the following:
As my persuing reason, lack of enough accurately in some works may cause to the suffering the health of people, even could result in death of some people. As an example, if someone whose job is airplaine mechanic and check the motor of airplains does not his work with adequate accurately only because of save time, live of tens of people would be exposed to the any damage, especially death due to the falling of airplain. So, for perevention of such risks, persons in such jobs are responsible to do their work with unlimited accurate.
Second, a production with inadequate accuracy probably would be destroyed earlier than one which is produce in more time but with more accuracy, so financially in some time its much better to spend more time for produce things. For example, a house which is built in at least time as well as at least time, would be destroyed earlier than a building which design and constructed in enough accuracy. Maitenance and repair cost as an additional cost would be a reasonable reason to the do works in maximum accuracy.
as another reason, although doing works in high speed would decrease the needed time, after a while needed time to repair might be even far more than the saved time at the first. As an sensible example, someone who think if his or her speed be higher than the speed limit he or she is able to save time and does not to the limit speed, therefore, unfortunately, an accident might take a lot of time of her or his. So, sometimes doing works with insufficient accuracy just due to the spending less time is potential to get more and more time of individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- cedar trees 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 70
- teachers should not make their political and social point of views known to students 60
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent's jobs than to choose jobs that very different from their parent's job. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...h the consequence that demands level of this people for food, energy, land and such ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d such things have increased, supply of this demands needs to the steady and serious...
^^^^
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the jobs') or simply say ''most jobs''.
Suggestion: most of the jobs; most jobs
...to the steady and serious effort in the most of jobs. Although, both of high accuraty and sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 644, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...e to the latter compared to the former. Some of the my outstanding reasons for this choice ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 652, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'my'?
Suggestion: the; my
... latter compared to the former. Some of the my outstanding reasons for this choice are...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...al cost would be a reasonable reason to the do works in maximum accuracy. as another...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
... to the do works in maximum accuracy. as another reason, although doing works in...
^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...re than the saved time at the first. As an sensible example, someone who think if ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68915662651 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56389845059 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486746987952 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1250419182 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.166666667 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5833333333 20.6045352989 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111432028346 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050838567698 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275367187823 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769751944674 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00621755909109 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.