Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, businesses and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Scientific research and development are rungs of the ladder of life that we should climb carefully. There is a wide consensus among people that information regarding scientific research, business and academic world should be shared as much as means allow, but some are very skeptical about this overt cooperation. This essay will shed light on both these viewpoints.
Firstly, the idea that new developments in scientific and other subjects should be freely shared has tremendous benefits. This does not only helps us to increase the understanding of the topic but also teach us the act of communication with foreign peers. Unlike money or gold, knowledge is considered to be a treasure that expands multi-fold when it is passed around. The invention of antibiotics by Sir Alexander Fleming would never have materialized, if it weren't for the papers that he shared with his American counterparts. Therefore, it is more beneficial to share the recent findings of researches and surveys than to hoard it.
However, some are concerned that sharing might not be such a brilliant idea. There are some discoveries that are too sensitive to be made public. God forbid, if such studies were to fall in wrong hands, the safety and well being of the entire planet could be in jeopardy. For instance, there are strict laws in place regarding sharing of secrets of nuclear weapons development. Any person or state that breaches these laws is subjected to strict penalization by United Nations. Therefore, it is crucial to keep certain type of information private, so that public can live in peace.
The conclusion is very straight forward, if the data is valuable for the betterment of mankind then it should be shared by all means. But what happens if it isn't? I think it's favorable to keep it under lock and key if we want to avoid any global mishaps.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The bar chart below shows top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...tremendous benefits. This does not only helps us to increase the understanding of the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ng would never have materialized, if it werent for the papers that he shared with his ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'weapons'' or 'weapon's'?
Suggestion: weapons'; weapon's
...regarding sharing of secrets of nuclear weapons development. Any person or state that b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ed by all means. But what happens if it isnt? I think its favorable to keep it under...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96129032258 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78450633799 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5785154602 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4705882353 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293112556412 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770185706377 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078227147024 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157428902399 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079797065662 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.