Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays people of all ages are bombarded by TV programs, especially advertisements. Companies are trying to attract people by advertising their products even in strange ways. Although advertisings are usually bothering people, some people use this information that advertisers illustrate. These types of information can be absurd or sometimes with a big deal of imaginary information.
From my point of view, the advertisement should not be allowed toward children due to the fact that they cannot be ascertained whether it is true or not.
To begin with, some of the products are not good for children. Information about products on TV advertisements is exaggerated. People should be thoughtful to trust this kind of information. Because children cannot analyze this information, TV providers must make rules and control their content. For instance, if children watch an advertisement about snacks on TV, they would have an attitude to use this type of food. As far as we know, snacks that are produced in the food industry usually are not healthy and with low-level nutrients, even some of them are dangerous for young children below 5 age. Although we can talk to children who are above 5 years old and convince them not to use this kind of food, it is a bit more difficult for children under 5 years old.
In addition to the fact that I mentioned above, the psychological aspect of the TV advertisement should be considered. Parents should control their children and do not allow others to have effects on them. People on ages two to five have vulnerable characteristics and everything can affect them. Mass media especially TV can shape their mind to be a consumer. It is the reality of the advertisement. They want to take people under control and sell their products and young children's group are the best and easy choice. As result TV providers or organizations that control advertising content should control this matter.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I agree with this statement that TV advertisements should not be allowed toward children below 5 age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bobby1987 | 86 | view |
- Your friend has decided to switch careers but isn’t sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today’s world.” Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 3
- When a new technological device becomes available Some people buy it right away while others will wait until many have acquired it Which do you prefer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Although some people believe that it is important to keep old friends than making new friends, in another group of people’s perspective making new friends is as important as keeping old friends. I am inclined to be not fully agreed or disagreed with tha 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... it is true or not. To begin with, some of the products are not good for children. Inf...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, even so, for instance, in addition, kind of, by the way, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09195402299 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01519908988 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502873563218 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1937167607 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218131962062 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722059571131 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541392429603 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152331755943 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577879327777 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.