Dear Mr John
I am writing to you to express my dissatisfaction about the product which I ordered on your official wesite on 21 of July and have some problems, also some dissantangelemts that I encountered with your staff.
The first thing I would like to draw your attention to is the wrong information that is given on your site about phone charger. As there is written the charger is universal and can be used with any type of mobile phone. After receiving the phone I found out that this is only for S7 samsung gadget. Secondly, while checking the performance of charger with the phone belong to my friend, some technical problems were explored. As we can see the product did not charge the phone! Can you imagine how I felt when I know I bought unavialable product!
To make matters worse, I went to your service centre on 22 of July to get my money back aproximately at 13:20 and I was come across by your manager David who has not poor communicating parctise with customers. I was suggested to buy more expensive product instead of the charger and claimed that there is no possibility of refunding. I believe that everything happened to me was unacceptable and I therefore suggest that I be given a full refund and your impolite manager will be punished. Otherwise, I will have to take further action and appeal to the department of customs rights of civil court of Ishtikhan district.
I look forward to recieving full refund and hering from you soon
Yours faithfully
Alisher Bobonazarov
- Despite a large number of gyms, a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world. What problems are associated with this? What solutions can you suggest? 73
- Some people say that tourism has many negative effects on the countries that people travel to How true is this statement What can tourists do to reduce the harmful effects of tourism on local cultures and environments 100
- Advantages and disadvantages of living in a big city 81
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems. 61
- the diagram below shows a simple system that turns dirty water into clean water. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74242424242 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79876825852 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609848484848 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9266292829 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246055958128 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817711825683 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680914144473 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134620507315 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619377224097 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.