Nowadays, more and more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or a negative development?
Today people tend not to have direct contact, as they prefer the social media and the indirect digital approach. Some consider it advantageous, while other clearly blame this progress of technology. In my opinion, there are advantages, but in circumstances of exaggerate use this will turn against society.
On the one hand, there are those who find this online socializing extremely convenient. Firstly, because this technological advancement gives the opportunity to meet people almost anytime and anywhere on Earth. Secondly, this use of digital means provides a degree of safety and invulnerability to both parts that meet.
On the other hand, the use of this social media networks may hide some serious hazards for the nature of the human social behaviors. By this I mean that it may produce a clear sense of estrangement from what real life is about by abolishing the genuine human touch from the relationship which struggles to be built. Another important thing that someone should take into account is the degree of the false or fake features that may be projected through this platform as someone, deliberately or by his will to be more acceptable, may project on this online socializing. It is easy for someone to think that behind the physical detouch that is provided by the online social media many people may lie about them selves in order to give a better impression of their selves. That is the reason for the acute reaction against the unlimited use of this platform to be in contact with the others.
In conclusion, although there undisputable arguments that give reasons for the use of the internet for socializing, although we should be aware of the dangers that are hidden behind its use on this purpose.
- Nowadays, more and more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- The charts show where people get their news and how much they trust these sources.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- It has been argued that gift giving should not be encouraged, because money is often wasted on things that people do not like or want. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 706, Rule ID: THEM_SELVES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'themselves'?
Suggestion: themselves
... social media many people may lie about them selves in order to give a better impression of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, i mean, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03460207612 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75817834854 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4675599016 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119204971942 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046183032155 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247484808765 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700537659399 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314522137942 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.