Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by adsdfdssd on Tue, 11/05/2019 - 12:03

The computer attracts children in various ways. One of the prominent ways is computer games.
In my view, I think playing games on the computer is a misuse of time and kids should not be
allowed to play computer games for a few reasons which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, playing games can lead to do badly in the exam. Because of playing games on the
computer, children waste most of their valuable time and do not get a sufficient amount of time
to study. For this reason, they might do a bad result in the exam. My own experience is a
compelling example of this. About 10 years ago, when I was reading at school, my father bought
me a computer. I became so excited to have the computer and started to explore the computer.
Then, one day one of my friends, named Akash, gave me a computer game to play. The game
was amazing. I started to play the game and at the weekend I played the game all day long. I did
not study a lot and as a result, I got a very bad grade in the exam on that term. The result was the
worst in my student life. This would not happen if I did study well-instead of playing the
computer game.

Second, playing computer games is deleterious to health. Because, if a child sees the computer
screen continuously, the UV ray from the screen could damage their eyes. In contrast, if they
play in the field with their friends and do exercise, they can be able to live a healthier life. For
example, Atik, who was 10 years old and my cousin, used to play computer games whenever he
got time. He also saw movies and drama on the computer as well. After a few years, suddenly he
realized that he did not see clearly, objects which are in a distant location. Then, he became
afraid and told me everything. I immediately suggested to him to tell everything to his parents.
When he told his parents, they took Atik to visit an eye doctor. Then, the doctor told him that his
eyesight decline. Therefore, the doctor suggested to him an eyeglass for clear vision. If he did
not play computer games, his eyesight would not decline.

In conclusion, I strongly support that playing computer games is not good for children. Because
playing computer games hamper our study, and are deleterious for our health as well.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in my view, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51079136691 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42507588485 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47242206235 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0047018594 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.8620689655 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3793103448 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13793103448 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.53405017921 529% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322078107323 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884999665819 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906068227033 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101933628436 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871256076572 0.0645574589148 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.