In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is, therefore, sure to increase. The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to riverside recreational facilities.
With the information provided about, the assumption leading to conclusion remains unfounded. Manson City Park devoted modicum money for maintaining riverside. Because of lack of evidence, the assumptions made were erroneous .Hence the conclusion is ill- founded. This argument is well presented yet far-fetched.
The primary assumption underlying author's conclusion is that using of the river for water sport. However, he fails to preclude the possibility that reason that. Want of some prudent answers makes the author assumptions full of holes. It might be possible that using river for utilizing not just sport. As a matter of fact water sport is not a sole reason for using of water. So, to reinforce of the argument the author should have discussed about other usage for river not just sport or facility tools.
Furthermore, the author of the assumption avers that there is a plethora of complaints from residents about quality.
Nevertheless, the author fails to take other possible reason account into that occur due to adverse of smell of water is considerably detriment for setting and people that live there. Without considering and ruling out this and other possible reasons the quality of water is greatly indispensable. To reinforce the argument the author should have discussed about that pernicious of water in environment as well as.
In short, as discussed, the argument lacks the several vital evidence enumerated above. The conclusion cannot be tenable. He should have discussed about detail of using of water of a considerable amount of using not just sport. Besides, quality of water particularly color or taste. On the other hand, to make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observation method. After all, feckless attempt with a fallible method could be nothing but a fool's errand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | jason123 | 59 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Ammu helen | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | ramji90 | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | shekhawat24 | 49 | view |
- Person should never make an important decision alone 70
- Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. But l 62
- DO you agree or disagree?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent’s job than to choose jobs that are very different from their parent’ job. 70
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- Personal History Statement---1 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nce, the assumptions made were erroneous .Hence the conclusion is ill- founded. Th...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...e, the assumptions made were erroneous .Hence the conclusion is ill- founded. This ar...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e, the assumptions made were erroneous .Hence the conclusion is ill- founded. This ar...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
... fallible method could be nothing but a fools errand.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, nevertheless, so, well, after all, in short, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 289.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28027681661 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78551655913 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543252595156 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6105427738 57.8364921388 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.3 119.503703932 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.45 23.324526521 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148687491535 0.218282227539 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483634163717 0.0743258471296 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060691867555 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748221963429 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482330790967 0.0628817314937 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.3550499002 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.