tpo28
Judging by the given sets of materials, the focus of the lecture and the article is on the North Pole discovery by Peary. Despite the reading that supports Robert's claim to discover the North Pole due to three reasons, the lecture gives an opposing view because there is no evidence to confirm Peary's assertion.
First, the reading says scientists confirmed the truth of discovery by studying the evidence. However, the lecture rejects the reading point because a person, who examined the evidence was Robert's friend and he spent trip prices; Furthermore, the examination was lack of a precise analysis due to its time, which took just two days. Therefore, the test outcome is not reliable.
Second, the passage accepts Peary's discovery due to Tom Avery's experience, who traveled the distance with the same equipment in 37 days like Peary. On the contrary, the professor mentions some differences in their travel. First, Peary carried food sources during the trip, however Tom's food had provided by air-plane. The second difference was associated with weather conditions, which was unfavorable in Peary's travel, unlike Tom. Consequently, Tom's experience could not prove the North Pole discovery by Robert.
Third, the passage refers to some photos of the North Pole, which has taken by Peary. Whereas, the lecturer says that images are not strong evidence to believe Peary as a person, who found the North Pole for the first time. The professor mentions that experts use a particular method to find the sun's location base on the shadow; Due to the rudimentary camera, which has taken some unclear images, using the mentioned method to find out the exact location of the sun in the Peary's picture is infeasible. Consequently, it is impossible to learn where the images have taken.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-25 | Hamide | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | zizi.dream | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | crystal80314 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | DAISY CHANG | 71 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | ememari | 75 | view |
- T p o 42 85
- tpo28 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support 76
- tpo33-integrated 75
- Tpo 44 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...he focus of the lecture and the article is on the North Pole discovery by Peary. D...
^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'suns'' or 'sun's'?
Suggestion: suns'; sun's
...rts use a particular method to find the suns location base on the shadow; Due to the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09215017065 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58095407796 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.099335399 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317976037108 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101980566987 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648502318743 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182019141171 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073429757137 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.