The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day.
The pictures illustrate the transformation of the layout of an art gallery in 2005 and now.
Looking at the pictures, it is immediately obvious that the design of the art gallery significant changes, with new rooms being added and a number of services and equipment converted for different uses.
As can be seen from the map, the only facilities haven't been changed on the site are Exhibition room 1, 2 and 3. The reception desk has been moved to the centre of the entrance hall. On the north of the painting showroom, a lift has emerged, which allows visitors to go upstairs instead of stairs. Therefore, the space of the stairs and the gallery shop where the previously Cafe have been narrowed.
Regarding the west of the studio, the gallery office was demolished and replaced by a vending machine, below the vending machine where the former exhibition room 4 has now been divided into 2 places, 1 for temporary exhibition and 1 for children's area. Outside of the art exhibition area, a wheelchair access ramp has been added on the beside to the main entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-18 | nnglinh | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | Trangdodo | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | Trangdodo | 67 | view |
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 89
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people 84
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three di erent years who said they were interested in certain sports 95
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day 78
- The graph below gives information on the performance of a train company in October and November in 2008 74
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... seen from the map, the only facilities havent been changed on the site are Exhibition...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77297297297 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68578488854 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1743070436 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149044784536 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061445876445 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535755063972 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971655995955 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475648572015 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... seen from the map, the only facilities havent been changed on the site are Exhibition...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77297297297 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68578488854 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1743070436 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149044784536 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061445876445 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535755063972 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971655995955 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475648572015 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.