The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days.
to what extend do you agree??
Advancement technology these days has changed the way people producing the text, mostly people use spell-check to accomplish misspelling problems. However, some people thought that it might be lead people to ignore their faults. In this case, i intend to slightly disagree and for the reasons discussed in the entire paragraph.
Firstly, talking spell-check is common to help people evaluating their writings. it might be easier to check due to the application automatically correcting those faults. Mostly students and academicians use the automatic spell-check application to help their writing task like final projects, journal, article and other tasks. They will write more effectively and efficiently by using spell-check application than checking manually. Furthermore, that is not only usable in academic sector but also in common daily activities. A good point in case, the social media today has been supported by onward features which could give correction automatically when the users write carelessly. obviously, it is really helpful for many people since they could write the message effortlessly
.
In contrast, spell-check application is not always worthwhile in the whole human purposes. conventional methods is needed yet in certain conditions. Human always concern the accurate spelling in several cases. For instance, students attending to the classroom need to take notes the lecturer explanations. it might be worst, if the handwriting could not be read by other people, which it has essential value of knowledge. Furthermore, medical field also need to fix spelling words while hospital stakeholders write the report or patient health record.
So all in all, i once again reaffirm my position that the use of spell-check technology cannot alter how human write properly. There are several conditions when people can be helped by technology and when they should fully aware to write each word validly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e to ignore their faults. In this case, i intend to slightly disagree and for the...
^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... help people evaluating their writings. it might be easier to check due to the app...
^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Obviously
...ically when the users write carelessly. obviously, it is really helpful for many people s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ey could write the message effortlessly . In contrast, spell-check application i...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conventional
...worthwhile in the whole human purposes. conventional methods is needed yet in certain condit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...o take notes the lecturer explanations. it might be worst, if the handwriting coul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, so, while, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54576271186 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93737906361 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620338983051 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.913290976 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179686950876 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551949459934 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434809928293 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116155461267 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425237371564 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.