Given a choice between learning through classroom and learning through field trips (e.g visit to museums) which one do you think is better for child ?
The way to provide education has differed a lot in comparison to previous years. With every passing day, it is being tried to develop a new education and learning pattern for students so they they can absorb more of knowledge from a chunk of information. According to me learning through trips (e.g visit to museums) is better for a child.
Reports from many years have shown that students retain better if they learn through practical knowledge. Mugging up theories and facts cannot be called education. Or simply memorizing text from books cannot help in gaining knowledge. Getting educated from certain experiences and trips has always helped in the knowledge expansion of a child.
Secondly, when children go out to field trips e.g museums, archaelogical sites, etc they learn better. They can apply their previously learnt fact of books through some real-life examples. Since, pupils are going out with their schoolfellows, the trip would be filled with a lot of fun. And when something is taught to the child with fun, it is grabbed by the studiers for a greater amount of time.
For instance, when I was in my middle school, I used to study about some interesting topics of science other than my textbook. I was going through a lot of theories from internet and journals. But one day I thought of doing some experiments on my own related to some of the topics. I noticed that I retained better and I did not feel the need to revise the points again and again. All this change happened when I started doing experiment or in other words, we can say that when I decided to go through the practical part of subjects.
Last but not the least, going on trips along with classmates creates memories. In the future, it will remind us that how we used to study along with our friends and how much fun we used to do at that time. This approach will be fruitful to our education. We may have observed many times that some students are able to recognize the image of certain artifacts but they are not able to score well when asked about the same during exams.
To conclude, I will just say that going on trips will be beneficial for the child in the long run. And this study approach should be adopted by every country very soon for the betterment of students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-17 | tulika1999 | 70 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 3
- If a school was given more money should it be invested inorganising social activities for students after class hours or improve food at cafeteria Support with relevant reasons and examples 80
- Do you agree that you can purchase everything from a large store than purchasing things from the shops which are specialized in those shops 60
- Most people identify with a particular generation What are the qualities or characteristics that define your generation Use details and examples to support your explanation 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to pattern'
Suggestion: to pattern
...to develop a new education and learning pattern for students so they they can absorb mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: they
...on and learning pattern for students so they they can absorb more of knowledge from a chu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... knowledge from a chunk of information. According to me learning through trips e.g visit to mus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ms, archaelogical sites, etc they learn better. They can apply their previously learnt...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...g some experiments on my own related to some of the topics. I noticed that I retained bette...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...topics. I noticed that I retained better and I did not feel the need to revise th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64676616915 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48213337962 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524875621891 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0775759852 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9090909091 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227474653068 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716011109269 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103158158956 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122675624409 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661864775663 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.