The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target (what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve), and the number of complaints and passengers.
The bar charts indicate the proportion of on-time services provided by a bus company and how many passengers complained about these services in the period from 1999 to 2003.
In general, the target for the percentage of delivering services on time decreased during the period, but the actual results, mostly, did not reach the goal. Moreover, the number of complaints increased in the four out of five years.
In 1999 and 2000, the highest punctuality level was expected, that was 86% of services arriving on time. This expectation was then lowered down, to 85% in 2001 and 2002, and finally to 84.5% in 2003. The year 2000 witnessed the highest proportion of overdue services, with only 82% of bus arrived as the time committed. In 2003, however, the bus company achieved its target by providing just under 85% of bus journeys on time.
Regarding the response of the passengers, there were 70 people each 1000 journeys reported the problem of services in 1999. This figure increased considerably in the following year, with 30 more passengers complained. The feedback was only seen improved in 2001 when the number of complaints dropped to about 82 before the negative responses rose again and reached its peak of 120 in 2003.
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging 78
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 73
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can begrown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today hasto come from other regions Do you think the advantages of thisdevelopment outweigh disadvantages 84
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage of our natural environment What are the causes and solutions 53
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, moreover, regarding, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94685990338 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62062044571 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6320394704 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178359233946 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661368053158 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470292709298 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102800376532 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283046563232 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, moreover, regarding, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94685990338 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62062044571 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6320394704 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178359233946 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661368053158 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470292709298 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102800376532 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283046563232 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.