Has human harmed the Earth or made it a better place?
Earth is the most important planet in universal because of its condition for the existence of life. In this matter, a question raised about whether human harms this pretty plant or not? Although some people believe that human activity improves the quality of life on earth, I think this kind of activity damages the earth. I will delve some reason to support my opinion.
The first noteworthy point is that the advanced industry leads to the consumption of fuel, which makes an increase in carbon dioxide during centuries. Now, we have a polluted planet, which is a threat to every existence in the world. The Global organization brings witnesses to support the extinction of some births and other fauna in the pol due to pollution. We as a human are not the only creature in the world and we must keep it clean for others since the circulation of nature won't mix up. That means if a kind of animal fade away from the earth, it will cause important damage to the earth, which all comes from pollution produced by humans.
Furthermore, the excessive use of staples such as oils and wood triggers a big shortage of nature. For example, by using the woods of jangles the earth will counter with soil erosion. Consequently, this destroys so many types of plants and effects independently the climate. Additionally, it decreases irrigation, which causes the earth changes to a desert. That is why I believe human changes the world.
To sum up, not only humans could not change the earth to a better world, but also cause serious damage to the earth. I believe people around the world should take care of their planet. Politics and scientists must think to solve this difficulty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-20 | Niusha405 | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | rohitbibra | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | chaitali patel | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | chaitali patel | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | chaitali patel | 70 | view |
- Modes of communication are constantly changing What are some of these changes Say which one change you like best and why 83
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 85
- Has human harmed the Earth or made it a better place 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and e 70
- TPO 54. The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is be 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, i think, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76288659794 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53746504934 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6402218596 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5294117647 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208858214866 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059650749414 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724149925409 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130917371253 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495074834068 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, i think, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76288659794 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53746504934 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6402218596 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5294117647 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208858214866 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059650749414 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724149925409 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130917371253 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495074834068 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.