Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam
how true do you think this statement is?
what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
it is widely believed that the number of car owners has spiraled out of control, which has led to terrible traffic congestion often in many cities over the last 30 years. In my opinion, I agree with this statement because it increases the number of vehicles on road, so it will create bad traffic congestion. In this essay, I am going to look at this and point out some solution for curtailing using of cars in cities.
Obviously, the increasing number of private cars swell the ranks of vehicles riding on the road. Therefore, it causes bad traffic jams. Take Hanoi as an example; the annual rise rate of car ownership in this city was 20% in 2019, which makes Hanoi is grappling with bad traffic jams in on-peak hours in recent years. it has an extremely adverse effect on the people’s daily lives.
However, I believe that there is also some plausible solution for the municipal government, which may reduce congestion risks. Firstly, the authorities can increase the inner-city road tax for private cars. it is clearly that when the expenses for a car go up, owners will bound to consider about using private cars. Hanoi, for example, the government decided to impose a new tax law for private cars last year, from 1000 dollars up to 2500 dollars and the register for a new car will hold 10% of the car’s value. it has made people reconsider of owning or using a private car. there are also many other measures for helping ease traffic, such as raising traffic law implementation awareness or building new roads, etc. but it seems for long-team plans.
In conclusion, I believe that the increase of car owners is the reason for the terrible traffic congestion, but by rising toll, raising awareness or building roads, the government may dishearten people from using their cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is widely believed that the number of c...
^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e bad traffic congestion. In this essay, I am going to look at this and point out...
^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... jams in on-peak hours in recent years. it has an extremely adverse effect on the ...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e inner-city road tax for private cars. it is clearly that when the expenses for a...
^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...w car will hold 10% of the car’s value. it has made people reconsider of owning or...
^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...sider of owning or using a private car. there are also many other measures for helpin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, look, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80967741935 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51311026519 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8252830017 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269772844192 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895001371698 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521388685605 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174870606373 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158590064286 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.