The graph below shows trends in US meat & poultry consumption
The line graph compares the amount of money was spent on 4 different species (beef, pork, broilers, and turkey) in the US from 1955 to 2012.
Overall, spending on beef & pork remained relatively stable, in comparison with significant and steady rises in the figures for broiler & turkey, respectively over the period surveyed.
In the year 1955, the Americans spent nearly 60 pounds on beef consumption, while the figure for pork was slightly lower, at 50 pounds. Remarkably, over 6 years from 1955, there was no consumption in broilers and turkey. During the following 52 years, beef is significantly more popular than the others, and its consumption reached a peak of 90 pounds in 1976.
By 2012, pork had surpassed beef and dominate the market with being spent on approximately 55 pounds by the Americans, and spending on beef was down close to 50 pounds. In the same year, the figure for broilers was just over at 40 pounds, which was 4 times as much as that of turkey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 95
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
- In some cultures children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 67
- The graph below shows trends in US meat poultry consumption 11
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in 3 different countries 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6741683699 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5092826289 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0481752117166 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287084276913 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358974526209 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0362303511239 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397386984643 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.