It is more important for teachers to connect with students than to be experts in their fields.
Nowadays, the number of teachers has increased, so, there are many styles of teachers. The name of the game in education is to teach students most efficiently. The most discussed part is which a style of teachers is better between teachers who have the ability of connection and professional knowledge. Some people think that connecting with students is more crucial than mastering in their fields. However, the most sufficient part of instructors is to be skillful in their areas because being experts improve connecting with students, a chief role is to educate students.
First of all, the primary role of a teacher is to educate students, teachers who know a lot about a subject are able to quip their students with the knowledge, which means that they have a much greater impact on their students’ future success. Let me bring my personal story as an example, the teacher who influenced me the most was my math teacher in high school. Even though I didn’t have many opportunities to build a personal relationship with him, I learned more in his class than I did in any other. Because he knew so much about the information that was not included in the textbook. Thanks to him, I realized I had a talent for math and decided to pursue a career in engineering. If I had not learned the general subject at that time, I could not have my current career.
Second, having a world of techniques in their fields increase interacting with students. This is because students usually want to take classes that technical teachers teach. Thus, mastering their fields, teachers have more opportunities to connect easily with students. This means that being professional is conducive to fortify communication skills with students- another factor of the most significant. According to a statistic done by KIE, among classes teaching the same subject, 40% of the students who had to take the subjects choose a class which is known as the teacher are adept in his major and have a lot of teaching skills. This clearly shows that being good at their field helps teachers to ascend the number of connections with students.
In conclusion, masterful teachers in their field are more substantial than contacting students. This is because the principal function of a teacher is to provide information to students because offering knowledge aids students to succeed in their life. The more conclusive reason is that becoming polished instructors give rise to interplay with students. This is due to the fact that students prefer to take professional teachers’ classes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Young students should be allowed to play video games 73
- University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study 90
- People spend too much money on their pets even though there can be other good ways to spend money Give details and examples to support your response 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e in his class than I did in any other. Because he knew so much about the information t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00938967136 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81426715638 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488262910798 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3050126337 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.619047619 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09523809524 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445446688914 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136863759991 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962180992034 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294658039604 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621364084336 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.