Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Nowadays more and more people spend too much money on their pets (dogs, cats and others), although there are better uses for this money.
Domestic animals are undeniably important for humans for a long time since they could get some advantages from them like using their fairs, feathers, milk and so forth. When time pasts by, people grow to love these animals and a strong bond started to form between them. A controversial argument that is often raised regarding this topic is whether today, people overreact to spend money on their pets, although they can use the money for other issues or not. If I were obliged to answer, I would think that it is not rational at all to claim that people are wasting their money on their pets for several reasons, on a few of which I will elaborate consequently.
The first imperative reason is that a pet could be a source of peace for one person. In other words, in this hectic life that humans live, people are searching for an activity, a place, even other people or animals that soothe them. It is conspicuous that a great number of people find this feeling in having a pet. It is logical that people spend money as much as they want to be more relax and overcome their anxiety. Therefore, no one can limit the amount of money that people spent on their animals. Recently, I have read an article that can shed light on this issue. The scientists found out that people who have animals suffer less from anxiety and they are more relaxed when they hug their pets in comparison to when they are far from them. Moreover, they observed two groups of people in the same situation and found out that relatively people who have pets are calmer than those who do not have pets.
The second reason corroborating my view is that it is cruel to expect the owners of the animal to pay less attention to their pets since they consider their animals as a part of their family. Never does anybody question the money we spend on our family. My own experience is a compelling example to clarify this issue. I have a dog, Cloud. I adore him like he is my child. A week ago, I went to the park to walk around for fresh air. I unleashed him since I wanted him to play with other dogs. I got distracted by one of my friends whom I did not see for more than a year. Thus, I did not notice when Cloud run out to the street to chase a cat and a car collided to him. The vet said that his surgery would cost as much as buying a new car that I was planning to buy. I spent more than four years collecting it, however, I did not even hesitate and accepted the surgery and they started the operation right away. I decide it by my heart and I will never regret it later as I loved him like I love my son.
To sum it up, I strongly believe that it is understandable that nowadays, the number of people spending a considerable amount of money on their pets is rising at a fast rate. This is because not only are pets calming their owners and help them to get rid of the tension and anxiety, but also without a shadow of a doubt, pets are members of family and people willingly spend money on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-25 | sam0506 | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | amirmn | 82 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Harshitha2623 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-22 | Rustin_Panda | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual 84
- If you could meet a famous entertainer or athlete who would that be and why Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 70
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments and private companies should share their scientific discoveries with the rest of the world 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 96.0 43.0788530466 223% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 564.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27304964539 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28204645645 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482269503546 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8415145303 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6923076923 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19230769231 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333561959189 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870724977789 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691162942875 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209545029119 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414242428934 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 10.9000537634 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.