The use of mobile phones should be banned in public spaces such as libraries, transportation, and shops. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Mobile phone etiquette has become an crucial issue, with mobilizes ringing at funerals, wedding,movies and plays. Therefore, some people advocate their prohibition on pubic places. However, people disagree with a ban on cell phones in all public places. I would like to suggest that some places where " silence" is necessary, such as in concerts,meeting, and cinemas, the use of pagers and mobile phones should be banned. However, in public places such as restaurant or buses and public transport, where silence is not so strictly needed, the use of pagers and mobile phones can still be allowed.
Undoubtedly, using mobile in public places can distract other people and divert their attention. For instance, in libraries , people can be easily distracted through ringtones of incoming calls or people talking over the phone loudly with their loved ones. Even in public places like hospitals, cell phones can easily interfere with the medical equipment and also irritate the patient waiting to see the doctor. Moreover, it is usage in religious places can spoil the peace of those paying obeisance.
However, despite all the abuse of cell phones,one cannot deny the usefulness of mobiles. They are very helpful in case of an emergency. They also keep loved and near ones well connected. No matter where ones goes, cell phones are the only hope of keeping families connected without any hassle. The SMS is also a convenient way to keep in touch with yours loved ones, when no one has the time for waiting long letters. Mobile are also a great source of entertainment. You can listen to songs,play games,get live cricket scores, market-update and even the headlines. They are convenient, easily accessible and of great use.
Moreover,these modern devices are very important in this commercial and financial society. Therefore, the total banning of pagers and mobile phones in public places is not at all practice. It will cause inconvenience and the people would not be able to catch up with the modern trend of communication. Cellphones have become vital tools in today's world and blocking them in public places will result in a gross violation of personal freedom.
To sum up, mobile invented for our convenience and not to create nuisance. If used judiciously, widely and with public etiquette, Mobile can be of great use. Banning the cell phone would not be practical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-02 | lovepreet000 | 73 | view |
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 56
- In many countries traditions and customs are disappearing What are the reasons What should schools and parents do to keeping our traditions alive 56
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity What are the advances of a family meal Do you think eating together is important to people in your country 84
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and 64
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Mobile phone etiquette has become an crucial issue, with mobilizes ringing a...
^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , movies
...h mobilizes ringing at funerals, wedding,movies and plays. Therefore, some people advoc...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...me people advocate their prohibition on pubic places. However, people disagree with a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , meeting
...' is necessary, such as in concerts,meeting, and cinemas, the use of pagers and mob...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ir attention. For instance, in libraries , people can be easily distracted through...
^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , one
...er, despite all the abuse of cell phones,one cannot deny the usefulness of mobiles. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ar ones well connected. No matter where ones goes, cell phones are the only hope of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , play
...f entertainment. You can listen to songs,play games,get live cricket scores, market-u...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , get
...ment. You can listen to songs,play games,get live cricket scores, market-update and ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , these
...accessible and of great use. Moreover,these modern devices are very important in th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15424164524 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76771207169 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539845758355 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9673786291 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5416666667 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2083333333 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70833333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265937956939 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757723069907 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746959265295 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1598035825 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088005949989 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.