The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred.
The two pie charts illustrate the percentage of energy generated from 5 different categories of sources in the US between 1980 and 1990.
Overall, in both years, oil, natural gas, and coal was the main means of energy gneration. Additionally, oil and gas shared a similar upward trend over the given period, and the opposite movement was true for coal sources and nuclear power.
In 1980, the proportion of energy produced from oil sources ranked top, at 42%. In comparison with natural gas, which manufactured somewhat 26% of all the energy in the US in 1980, coal constituted a smaller fraction of 22%. The rate of energy generated from nuclear power was the same as that taken from hydroelectric power, at 5%.
From 1980 and 1990, the percentage of energy generated from oil resources experienced a dramatic decline of about 9% to 33%. The rate of energy made from gas shared a minimal decrease of about a mere 1% to 25%, over the given period. As for that taken from coal and nuclear segment, there was a moderate increase of around 5% in both resources to 27% and 10% respectively, over a decade. Interestingly, hydroelectric seemed to be the most unpopular way to produce energy in USA, because the rate of it stayed unchanged, at a modest 5%, over this time period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | bachduong123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-08-05 | doanthao2082003 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-04 | gggggggggggggggggggggg | 61 | view |
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 61
- In the past people used to travel to see the differences from their home country However the sceneries in places around the world seem similar nowadays What are the causes of these similarities Do you think that the advantages of these similarities outwei 84
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People say that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...from oil sources ranked top, at 42%. In comparison with natural gas, which manufactured so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72846579724 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9499552772 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118281571423 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551870905773 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233287934749 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837345676633 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129455768237 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.