The graph below gives information about international tourists arrivals in five countries.
The graph below gives information about international tourists that travels for pleasure, arriving in five different countries for the past 15 years.
The countries visited by the international tourists are Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and USA. USA and France has the highest number of arrivals over the years.
In 1995, USA had 70 million international tourists arrivals, making them the highest visited country in that year. As the year on there was an increase in the population but after the year 2005 there was a slight decrement in the population. France was the second most visited country in 1995. Between the year 2000 and 2005,there was a slight increment then from 2005 to 2010,the population started to rise. In Malaysia,the increase in population from the year 1995 to 2010 was just 20 million to 40 million respectively making them the third most visited country. Tourists that arrived in Brazil in 1995 was higher than those that visited Egypt by a little margin but by 2010, the tourist that visited Egypt increased while Brazil decreased.
In conclusion, USA had the highest number of tourists than France in 1995,both had the same number of international tourists in 2010.
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made 54
- University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of the studies 73
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots 56
- Stress related illnesses are becoming increasingly common 56
- The graph below illustrates the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... population started to rise. In Malaysia,the increase in population from the year 19...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then, third, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72727347664 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505102040816 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4017379275 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279749993721 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125990547512 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163222481605 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236894149786 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.200186059774 0.0819641961636 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.