Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that only a few wild animals should be protected. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many campaigns have usually been widely carried out all over the world to support conservations. Some opinions assume that it is only necessary to protect a few wild animals, however, some critics think that we should protect all. While we cannot deny the importance of any particular species, I would argue that some of the wild animals should be concerned more.
On the one hand, all species should be protected equally for many reasons. First of all, each species individually plays an integral part in their own food chain and keep the natural world balanced. In the case of disappearances of any wild animals, the whole natural food chain probably can be disrupted, which may result in further degradation for ecosystems. Furthermore, most scientists agree that we have no exact understanding of how a certain species’ genome is important. In fact, we are not sure whether humans can be reliant on a particular species in the future to search for a cure in case of researching mouses or its genome even makes a great contribution to our developments.
On the other hand, some of the animals should be under a stricter protection because of their well-being. Firstly, humans’ unsustainable expansion actually has been caused environmental degradations no matter our consciousness or unconsciousness, in which some wild animals’ populations exaggeratedly dropped down. Tiger is a typical example as they always live on the brink of extinction because of the lack of accommodation and food as well, and therefore, they may be got out of this planet anytime. Secondly, from a medical perspective, there always are some species in the nature that can enable people to deal with health issues, so governments should impose better preserving proposals to ensure our living standards in the future.
In conclusion, although it is clear that every wild animal is instrumental in retaining the balance of the environment, I believe that some of them should be preserved better than others for many reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | nguyentranvn | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | yjjjj | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-18 | ththaian | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | kellychichi | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012 67
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 81
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 78
- The chart shows the percentage of the adult population employed in different categories in 2003 and 2013 73
- The chart below shows the unemployment rate and the number of people leaving Ireland from 1988 and 2008 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... particular species, I would argue that some of the wild animals should be concerned more. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o our developments. On the other hand, some of the animals should be under a stricter prot...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...ndly, from a medical perspective, there always are some species in the nature that can ena...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15596330275 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05171810322 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593272171254 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6001765601 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379873242117 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137863268123 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12237167449 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248376560134 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884204909729 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.