In many countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some people think that this is the responsibility of government to solve the problem. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, childhood obesity has aroused public attention and become a typical sign of deteriorating social health all over the world. Notwithstanding some people believe governments should take the full responsibility to improve this situation, the vital role of parents and schools should be far more significant.
On the one hand, the role of the competent government is to ensure the balance of children's eating habit. First, since fast food, especially fried and fatty ones, gains popularity in children's daily meals, redundant energy accumulated under the form of grease causes obesity and related diseases. For that reason, the government should enact legislation that prevent food companies from producing unhealthy convenience food as well as advertising them on mass media which indirectly keeps children away from high-calories-contained food with a high level of preservatives. Second, the more children prefer staying at home, playing online games and watching TV to playing outdoor and sports activities, the more energy absorbed from fast food is not consumed. Thus, the government should facilitate equipment at parks or schools as well as organize some campaigns to foster playing sport's awareness of children.
On the other hand, the duty to combat childhood obesity in children should not fall on the government alone, parents need to share this nation burden. From what has been mentioned, children's way of life is the gist for their health problems and it is parents that should be primarily liable for this matter. First, as an obese child is often malnourished and does not receive appropriate nutrients, parents should always keep an eye on what their children are eating and educate them about the consequences of an unbalanced diet. Adding that parents are recommended to cook at home and form an appropriate habit of eating in children which leads to limiting the amount of fast-food consumed by the kids. Second, obesity can be caused by a lack of physical activities resulting in the sedentary lifestyle by a large number of youths. Parents should spend more time playing with their offspring and encourage them to have more physical tasks and exercises on a daily basis.
The government should do what they want to curb the overweightness in children, no matter how small impacts might be. It is true that parents are to blame to this issue and need to take responsibility for their kid's unhealthy condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-28 | lynkchillie0911 | 73 | view |
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree with 95
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage c 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 808, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...resulting in the sedentary lifestyle by a large number of youths. Parents should spend more time ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, thus, well, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24296675192 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93001998369 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552429667519 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2707240008 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170312384161 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618852451223 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456620852586 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122163236127 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413285288047 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.