8. The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph compares the number of people travelling to work by car, bus or train in the United Kingdom.
It is noticeable that cars had been the most popular way to travel in every year since 1970 and is expected to keep the position till 2030. The number of people who like to take train increased from the lowest point in 1970 to its peak in 2030, surpassing those for bus passenger.
In 1970, about 5 million commuters chose to drive a car while the number of people who took the train to work was less than half of it (2 million). However, ranked as the second common transportation chosen by about 4 million people, the bus had become less and less popular over the 60-year period. Also, 2015 saw the population for commuting by train overtook that of taking the bus, with approximately 3.5 million people.
By 2030, with a similar rising trend, the numbers of people who travel by car and train are predicted to reach their peak with 9 million and 4.4 million respectively. By contrast, the number of bus takers will fell by 1 million.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-10 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 61 | view |
2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | view | |
2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | 10 | view |
- 5 The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- TPO 43 80
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55263157895 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4164085894 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.542746684 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293582488442 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14348632156 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663014406441 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206158295341 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500941157963 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.