encyclopedias
The reading and the lecture are about communal online and printed encyclopedias. The author of the reading mentions controversies with the online encyclopedia. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author and comes with plausible solutions which are mentioned as follows.
First of all, the author says the online encyclopedia lacks academic credentials and are inaccurate. However, the lecturer tells that no encyclopedia is correct whether it is printed or online. she mentions if someone needs a really comprehensive reference book without any mistakes then they never going to find it online or offline. She additionally mentions that errors are made in the online encyclopedia can be corrected easily but when coming to the printed books errors are going to remain for decades.
Secondly, the writer mentions that the online encyclopedia can be hacked and the information can be corrupted. The professor contradicts this and says that the articles cannot be changed because no one disputes or intervenes in the format already made, this way articles of online are reliable. she also mentions that there are special editors who can eliminate, clear the mistakes, and also they can make changes to the articles.
Finally, the author posits that online encyclopedias provide a false impression of what is important and what is not. The article also mentions that there is no sense of proportion for online encyclopedias that what they should include and exclude. The lecturer, However, rebuts this by mentioning that printed encyclopedia has limited space so that they will think before they include some topic, whereas with the online encyclopedia space is not an issue. she elaborates this by bringing up the point that in fact, a great variety of topics can attract a great diversity of user interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages What type of communication do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples t 61
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 70
- Asteroids 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...roversies with the online encyclopedia. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...orrect whether it is printed or online. she mentions if someone needs a really comp...
^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...is way articles of online are reliable. she also mentions that there are special ed...
^^^
Line 7, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ine encyclopedia space is not an issue. she elaborates this by bringing up the poin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27491408935 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8418267476 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9859322402 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271326740359 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124222780029 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111949362704 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180090631625 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084161319603 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.