The pie charts illustrate data on the changes in the expenditure on various services and goods in a nation in Europe between 1958 and 2008, measured in percentage.
Overall, it is clear that spending on food, luxury commodities, and housing increased, while the opposite was true for the remaining categories, namely entertainment, travel/ transport, and clothing throughout the observed period.
More specifically, clothing accounted for the largest percentage of people’s spending among other kinds of commodities, with a rate of roughly one-third in 1958, decreasing significantly to over 10% after five decades. Meanwhile, the figure for luxury items was by far the lowest compared to the remaining categories, with only 7% in 1958. Its figure, however, had risen rapidly to 17%, reaching a similar level as food expenses by 2008.
In terms of services, on the other hand, people tended to favor housing over entertainment, with a proportion of 22% and 18% in 1958, respectively. While the former figure experienced a dramatic rise of 10% in 2008, the later figure witnessed the opposite trend, with a two-percent reduction. Additionally, expenditure on travel/transport dropped to half, from 13% in 1958 to 6% in 2008.
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land therefore they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 92
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact with many people Does the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39896373057 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2071073987 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621761658031 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8681457234 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177767539963 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738859050514 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337222138594 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104069915994 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312644355824 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.