The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the amount of four type of waste materials namely: paper, glass, tins and garden in a five-year period of time from 2011 to 2015, measured in tons of waste.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that the amount of paper and glass collected was far higher than that of the others in this period of time.
More specifically, this period showed that paper waste was the most common out the other three with a notable exception of glass waste with the highest figure of 48 tons in 2013. This figure, however, was less than roughly 2% compared to that of paper in 2012. 2012 witnessed an overall drop of the four contributors, while the amount of tins experienced a slight fall of 8 tons, that of garden decreased drastically to half of the initial one. In the next three years, moreover, these figures experienced an upward trend and reached their peaks at 70 tons and 52 tons for paper and glass respectively.
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 67
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 73
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 89
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
..., glass, tins and garden in a five-year period of time from 2011 to 2015, measured in tons of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... higher than that of the others in this period of time. More specifically, this period show...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60795454545 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43965787086 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.301398954 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.166666667 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121585554825 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549173084338 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702639155001 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928763510236 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688973802315 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.