The chart below shows the percentage of river water in UK rivers that is classified as having good chemical quality between 1990 and 2002.
The given line graph illustrates the proportion of those excellent chemical value river water had been selected in four UK regions over a course of 12 years starting from 1990.
It can be seen from the graph, it is clearly evident that the rate of river water in Northen Ireland was dramatically fluctuated. Moreover, England and Scotland seemed to more increase, while the percentage of river water in Wales has a rapidly went down in the last year research.
In 1990, the proportion of river water in the Wales was highest, over 95%, whereas in Scotland was significantly lower, around 95%. The percentage of river water in Northen Ireland accounted for about 92% of the UK total. At the same time, England had the worst river quality, which was over 80%. By 2000, Wales witnessed a dramatic decrease of over 95% to around 93%, while three others figures for river water were rose up.
In 2002, Norhthen Ireland and Scotland had superb river water chemical quality in the UK, were same approximately 98%, whereas the proportion in Wales saw a sharp decline of 97% to under 95%. Meanwhile, value of river water in England remained stable at roughly 85%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | Sachin0110 | 72 | view |
| 2020-05-16 | hoangtruongoffical | 74 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | thaovuphuong19 | 72 | view |
- The chart show the info about the use of Internet in 5 coutries in Europe in 2000 70
- The chart below shows the percentage of river water in UK rivers that is classified as having good chemical quality between 1990 and 2002 74
- The graph below shows the number of new homes built in a particular region in the UK from 2010 and the figure predicted for 2020 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81909547739 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48122161353 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6596632473 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790490614358 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395216110593 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413713557245 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585798056829 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348200786235 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.