The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The tested and proven method to gain someone's side is to provide a convincing argumentation.Undoubtedly, if an argument is able to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint, it can be considered as powerful. Providing that the thinking of the person with different opinion is following the logic. Oftentimes, people's opinions are so ossified, that it is impossible, even for the most sound argument, to change people's mind.
Firstly, different religious views are mostly inculcated to people's minds form their very early childhood. It must be very challenging to convert a person from one denunciation to another. Moreover, religion is mostly based on beliefs and feeling rather than facts. Here, the most reasonable arguments on one side can be completely unsound on another side.
Secondly, turning to political views, it is very hard to gain a disciple from another political option. In many countries political opposition finds the ideas of a leading party incongruous, just because (by definition) they should be in opposition to them. In such situations, reaching consensus in any field, is available only when the process of exchanging argumentation is on very high cultural level. Often, everything ends with quarrels that leads to lack of agreement. Here, not only argumentation, but also clever representation of argumentation will have decisive role.
At least, there are numerous techniques that advertising companies use to gain potential customers and win their approval. It is psychology of an argument that has important role in the dispute. Leaving the best argument for last in order for the opponent to remember it, is one of psychological approaches. Additionally, conceding the argument of opposition also influence the opposition's inclination to our own views. In the end who does not like to be praised?
To summarize, failure in convincing someone with an opposing viewpoint does not necessarily mean that the argument was weak and poorly reasoned. Some areas are unarguable. It is the way we serve the argument that matters the most to gain someone's side.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-06 | ShrutiUrkude | 50 | view |
2020-03-21 | shubhamaggarwal | 100 | view |
2016-07-22 | iambier | 50 | view |
2015-05-06 | ninadabiri | 40 | view |
2018-09-20 | mb1502 | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 70
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing."During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Exper 78
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 75
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 90
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 330 350
No. of Characters: 1712 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.262 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.188 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.986 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 89 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.095 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.267 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.507 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.048 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5