In today's galloping world, survival is not possible without working properly. While many people may believe that working slowly but correctly will be better, I think otherwise. In my opinion, working fast and more erroneous outweighs the other choice since it makes us experienced learning from our mistakes.
First of all, it is unavoidable not to make mistakes when we work quickly. However, making mistakes makes us more experienced in every field of work; because we have to correct these mistakes, it makes us try different things in our jobs and our life. Trying various positions or solutions helps us find the ultimate occupation or idea we were always waiting for. For instance, my uncle usually says this to me. He has tried several professions and finally found his ideal job after eight years of trying new things. He says he could not be happier than that moment in which he reached that job. Now he is a very successful manager and found his own company in that field. If he had not tried many jobs in the past, he would not be able to thrive in his life by obtaining experience.
In addition to the above statements, by taking risks and making mistakes, we learn new ideas. If one wants to work slowly and try not to make any fault, they must be so careful that it prevents them from learning new ideas and solutions, and eventually succeeding. For example, when I was in middle school and had to do a project for my physics, I could not make it work; because I was afraid to make mistakes and lose score. After a few days, however, I realized that I have to find a way for this problem. So, I tried many possible ideas, and finally, one of them works. If I had not tried many ideas, I could not learn physics via doing that project.
To sum it up, by taking into account all the discussed words, I firmly believe that working fast with more flaws is better than working more slowly since we enjoy learning from our mistakes and gain more experience. Who has ever succeeds without failures?
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it s better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a sense of humor 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Agree or disagree Working slow and correctly Or working fast and risk making mistakes 66
- Agree DisagreeMovies and TV programs have more negative effects than negative effects on the way young children behave 83
- Agree or disagree Today parents are more involved in their children s education than in the past 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays galloping world, survival is n...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperienced learning from our mistakes. First of all, it is unavoidable not to m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in his life by obtaining experience. In addition to the above statements, by ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... learn physics via doing that project. To sum it up, by taking into account all...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56509695291 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40808981784 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534626038781 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4408994878 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7368421053 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310424444718 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894813618573 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975304541765 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209345436216 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538089903785 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.