Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?
An increasing number of film directors begin to realize that, it’s the best way to shoot a movie based on an original book, in order to make a huge box-office success. When tons of book-based films come into business, a question is raised to audience that whether they should read the original books first or watch the movies ahead? From my own perspective, I prefer to read the original book in the first place.
Before we actually getting down to business, I concede that watching the movies first provides a stronger and fresher blast for our sensory systems. After all, the sensory blast won’t last too long because there are so many images of bursting visual sense nowadays and the memory of the movie can be submerged by these analogs.
First, reading a book is actually an exercise for our imagination ability of our brains. Experiment shows that human brains are put to maximum use when we demonstrate an active participation when reading a new book, which means if we take full advantage of our imagination ability to comprehend a book, our brains can be benefited and possess a better visual ability. By contrast, watching the film in the first place will limit our imagination even interfere with the coming reading process. For instance, I had watched the movie Fight Club before I came up to its original book. With all due respect, I do agree that the movie is a masterpiece and Edward Norton and Brad Pitt performed marvelously, but I was still trapped by the movie’s scenes and the handsome “haunted” appearance of Brad Pitt, so that my imaginative organ disabled and I could not even form my own perspective about the book, which was a pity. So, if people are craved for first-hand ideas and improvement of imaginative ability, they should enjoy the book first.
Secondly, reading original books at the beginning enables readers to comprehend the adaptions objectively. Traditionally, original books are more abundant in plots and descriptions than their film adaptions. Movie adaptions are subject to time, so the playwrights will rearrange the plots or cut off some scenes which are actually tiny indicators of the character’s emotions or essential pushes to the plots’ progression. Taking my experience into consideration, the original book Angels And Demons explains why the pope servants schemes to blow Jerusalem away and the trauma he had in his childhood, while the movie adaptions ignore this detail. For me, the former reading allows me to notice this detrimental flaw in this movie, while other audience who hadn’t read the origin before might be perplexed or even have a bad impression on the movie and the original book. All in all, it’s better for the people who want to know every details and have objective opinions about adaption movies to read the original books first.
Due to the analysis above, I believe it’s rational for people read original books before watching their adaption films, in order to develop a better ability of imagination and have an objective opinion about the movies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovie can be submerged by these analogs. First, reading a book is actually an exe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, after all, for instance, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2549.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00785854617 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70331132621 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520628683694 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 809.1 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7997134665 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.611111111 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2777777778 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462892361265 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154642279453 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712599591034 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255760256777 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890520640113 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.