Museums and art galleries are past their use-by date.. In modern society, culture and art are best accessed online by computers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Internet is a part of information revolution which does not only allow people to connect to each other but also empower people to access to an enormous mass of data. By using internet, a person no longer need to visit a museum or art gallery but still able to enjoy or study of culture and art which raises a question that whether the existence of museum and art galleries are no longer needed. In my view, museum and art are irreplaceable and they shall continously keep a crucial role in society for a long time.
Firstly, it is obvious that enjoying art and culture in museum or gallery brings multidimensional multisensory experience to the guests. This means that a guest could obtain more memorable experience in art gallery than simply looking at a picture online. Attending at exhibition room, the visitors are able to observe details and textures of the artifacts then discuss to each other about what they are concerned which brings a interactive and communicative environment to the visitors, the environment internet does not offer.
Moreover, the organisation and arrangement of artifacts in museums or art gallaries are systematic and effective which helps visitors take less effort to study. For example, surfing and gathering random information of an artist on internet must be a hard work and also take time to classify or summarise information. In contrast, a gallery owner would classify artworks into category such as year, theme, artist and each artwork is also attached with additional information so it can be studied in systematic way.
That is not to say that studying culture and art on internet is not beneficial. Indeed, internet is an economical and convenient way to study any particular field. Althought internet does not always bring to learner a reliable systematic information, it is a helpful tool for seeking knowledge which can be combined with studying in museums and art galleries for more effective study.
In sum, visting museums or art galleries not only offers visitors an ideal environment to obtain knowledge but also gives them chance to interact with each other. Meanwhile, seeking information on internet is still a convenient way which is partialy supportive for studying in desirable field. By doing so, studiers would find their own suitable ways to study art and culture.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ut what they are concerned which brings a interactive and communicative environme...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, in contrast, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07832898172 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86818156948 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503916449086 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7791525633 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216061795571 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08437415155 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723069604801 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131430595513 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584438981837 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ut what they are concerned which brings a interactive and communicative environme...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, in contrast, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07832898172 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86818156948 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503916449086 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7791525633 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216061795571 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08437415155 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723069604801 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131430595513 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584438981837 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.