Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (liked by students) and effective in helping students in
learning.
Give reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, students have various attitudes towards teachers. In my opinion, it is really arduous for teachers to be both popular and efficient in assisting students to learn lessons because most students define a popular teacher as a person who does not assign much homework and not have strict rules. The paragraphs will aptly elucidate my perspective.
To begin with, most students are a big fan of teachers who do not assign homework every day. As a matter of fact, students will be so happy if teachers enable them to have many leisure time after school. Because they can do whatever they want since they do not have any task to do. For this, based students' point of view, these teachers are most likely to be liked by many students. However, some teachers believe that if they assign homework regularly, students are able to learn lessons effectively. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. When I was in high school, we had a math teacher who assigned much homework. At the end of term, students were asked to choose their favourite teachers, so guess what happened, yes, the math teacher was at the bottom of the list, it was actually because of assigning so many homework. Had he not assigned homework, his name could not have been at the bottom of the list. As a result, it is so tough to be both popular and productive teacher although many teachers insist on assigning any homework not matter to be popular.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that some people believe that teachers who allow students to do anything they want in class are not only popular but also effective, yet on the other hand, others believe that those teachers are not effective because the effective teachers are those who have many disciplines for performing their class. I will take the former viewpoint with a grain of salt, and claim that the latter idea is much more closer to reality, for it is not possible to be effective while not to have rules for classes and learning lessons. As a result, the more teachers are well-organized and have strict rules for their teaching style, the less they will be popular because you cannot find both characteristics on the same page and level.
To wrap it up, based on what mentioned above, one soon realizes that it would be so hard to be both popular and effective in helping students inasmuch as in the first place, effective teachers assign a lot of homework, which is not the sign of popularity among students, as in the second place, efficient teachers have many strict rules to control their classes, which it also is not a symbol of popularity.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-04 | 1SWEAT6 | 70 | view |
2021-12-30 | noushinhaddad | 70 | view |
2021-12-30 | noushinhaddad | 63 | view |
2021-12-21 | archerlao | 76 | view |
2021-01-08 | azxa7887 | 73 | view |
- Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 91
- All around the world people are living longer than ever before Which of the following do you think are the main causes of this phenomenon You may choose more than one option The development of new technology Changes to our eating habits Improvements to ou 67
- It is more important for governments to spend more money in the internet than public transportation. 66
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and 71
- Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Somepeople believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them topay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 827, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun homework seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much homework', 'a good deal of homework'.
Suggestion: much homework; a good deal of homework
...it was actually because of assigning so many homework. Had he not assigned homework, his name...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
... and claim that the latter idea is much more closer to reality, for it is not possible to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, well, while, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75550660793 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5368683954 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464757709251 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.03437354 48.9658058833 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.0 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7058823529 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2941176471 5.45110844103 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298536409186 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107746991094 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695493034496 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20616463986 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154949180156 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.