The issue of whether children should receive vaccines has been a heatedly discussed topic in recent years, and this has turned into a dilemma facing many people. Some claim that vaccines are hazardous and detrimental to human bodies whereas others do not agree. Personally speaking, I would assert that this idea is fallacious as there are many benefits accruing from receiving vaccines.
The rationality of repudiating vaccination should be recognized for the following reasons. To begin with, safety is the main issue many parents are concerned about, and this is because they are afraid their children would receive the fake vaccines that could do permanent harm to health or even lead to death. Also, there are some potential side effects that result from immunization. For instance, some children have been reported to feel nauseous, throw up and faint after they get vaccinated. However, this does not necessarily mean that vaccines are literally harmful, thereby jeopardizing children’s lives.
In fact, having children inoculated is mandatory and safe. First and foremost, there is plenty of evidence that this long-held practice could effectively safeguard children from infectious diseases such as polio, chicken pox and hepatitis B. According to a recent study published by the World Health Organization, vaccination has contributed to a worldwide slump in child mortality. In addition, vaccines need to be undergoing a long series of approval processes carried out by the certified health departments before being put into use. In other words, forging an official document imprinted on vaccines is by no means a facile task. If we choose to refuse vaccination, we will make our children susceptible to lethal illnesses. Most important of all, vaccines are being strictly tested for side effects before used for infants and children. Recent studies have revealed that the common side effects of vaccines are not only mild but also manageable. Therefore, there is no need to panic or fret about unnecessary trouble arising from immunization.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that vaccines can help protect against life-threatening diseases and secure our health. Hence, people should not hesitate over whether to receive vaccines or not.
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 84
- Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree 56
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 79
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 89
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37016574586 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81115591898 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3464909897 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.315789474 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186216115902 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546351764753 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282792728935 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108536123771 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241269431894 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37016574586 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81115591898 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3464909897 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.315789474 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186216115902 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546351764753 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282792728935 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108536123771 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241269431894 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.