9as sine children find some subjects at school difficult, they should be optional. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
All children are different and so are their skills and interests, therefore some people believe that pupils should learn only topics that they comprehend easily. I do not fully agree with this opinion, as certain skills, regardless of their difficulty, are necessary to all of us and children very often do not develop a real interest in certain subjects, until later in life. But at the same time, it is important not to overload children with unnecessary knowledge and build their readiness and willingness to learn.
There are many subjects that pupils might find boring or even difficult. It does not mean they are not important. We all need, for example, math to be able to calculate our own wages, biology and geography to understand our bodies and surroundings. Having a wide, but not necessary in-depth knowledge allows us to make sense of the world and leaves all the door open for future development. Let us imagine that math is not a compulsory subject and some children are unable to do simple calculations, as adults they would find it more difficult, if not impossible, to change their previously chosen career path, if they develop a sudden need or interest in science. As we live in times, when adults change their jobs multiple times, we have to keep our education options open and provide a multifaceted approach to learning.
On the other side, children's brains need a certain level of educational freedom to develop to their full potential. Attempts to cram as much knowledge are fruitless, therefore there must be a balance between pupil's individual interests in certain subjects and necessity to provide a wide spectrum of school subjects. In my opinion, British educational system found a perfect solution by introducing a topic based approach, which integrates knowledge from different fields. So a student will learn using different methods, developing a multitude of skills at the same time, learning to integrate different subject. For example, while learning about Egypt, student might be asked to dress up, cook regional food, all that while learning about culture and history. This way the "boring" subjects will be put into practical and more reliable context, making it more accessible.
In conclusion, even tho not all the subjects are equally interesting for children, they are all important, at least on the basic level. Denying pupils access to all different branches of education, would limit their future opportunities. At the same time, it is important to present it in an accessible and integrated way, so kids can see it as more than boring facts, but as an absorbing and always overlapping curriculum.
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet without any face to face contact with others To what extent is this a positive or negative development In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communi 84
- Government should find scientific research rather than commercial organization To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- Science and technology are more important than history 78
- Internet crime is increasing rapidly as more and more people are using the internet to make financial transactions What can be done to tackle this problem 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 599, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to career'
Suggestion: to career
...ible, to change their previously chosen career path, if they develop a sudden need or ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 498, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...fferent fields. So a student will learn using different methods, developing a multitu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14482758621 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85638451329 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542528735632 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7245344489 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203404170511 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621778785776 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528598892235 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121222643668 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356096822206 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.