In developing nations, There is an increase in international tourism. Is this more advantageous or disadvantageous?
In modern times, more and more people are touring to the advancing nations, which in turn leads to upsurge in the international tourism in such countries. I am of the view that it has more positive aspects then detrimentals. My justifications will be analysed in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are wide range of reasons why I perceived that tourism is vital for enhancing nations. The foremost one is that authorities will gain economical power with the help of travellers from across the globe. It is obvious that visitors will use hotels, transportation and purchase valuable local goods. All of these things are considered in the GDP of nation. Hence it can be said that this will improve GDP. To add to this, it will open more employment for the local citizens. A good illustration of this is Taj Mahal in India. Many tourists buy the same Taj Mahal sculpture made of marbles and granite by local workers of Agra. Also foreigners utilise auto rickshaw for their travelling. Which helps local citizens to earn valuable amounts of money.
Furthermore, turistas will learn local culture by visiting rural areas of advancing nations. It is observed that the lifestyle of our ancestors will be seen in the villages of nation like India, Pakistan, Nepal and other African countries, which are considered as developing nations.
Although it is very profitable but we can't overlook the darker side of tourism industry. It can be happened that historical monuments will be harmed by continuous visitors. Service staffs are hardly get any time to look after this valuable monuments. For instance, due to continuous visitors, Red fort in Delhi, India, was recently lost it's charm.
In conclusion, international tourism is the topic which is in trending for the debate. It has its own benefits with very few downsides. I conceive that it is must for enhancing nations to give priority to tourism industry. It will provide them many benefits in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-09 | Patel Nauman | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... view that it has more positive aspects then detrimentals. My justifications will be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...emost one is that authorities will gain economical power with the help of travellers from ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...gs are considered in the GDP of nation. Hence it can be said that this will improve G...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s and granite by local workers of Agra. Also foreigners utilise auto rickshaw for th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ise auto rickshaw for their travelling. Which helps local citizens to earn valuable a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... Although it is very profitable but we cant overlook the darker side of tourism ind...
^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...ous visitors. Service staffs are hardly get any time to look after this valuable mo...
^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...try. It will provide them many benefits in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, then, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0462962963 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7938270923 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58950617284 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.558176779 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0869565217 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0869565217 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.39130434783 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169804793962 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453619935316 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051517727111 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953474428554 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402695525891 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.