Technology has continued to advance since the internet expands the capacity of communicating with others. Through sharing creative ideas with others via technology, people enhance their creativity and innovation, which exemplifies countless new inventions such as smartphones and the various apps. Although technology has side effects for people, it has helped children to cultivate creativity than they were in the past.
First, technology allows people to gain better access to creative inspirations by communicating with others. More access people have to know others’ ideas and designs, the more they can learn from others. Expansion of the internet promotes the efficiency to do research, which encourages people to form their new ideas of problem-solving. Compared to the past, children are more familiar with using computers and smartphones these days. Not only adults but also children can take advantage of the technology to collect data and inspiration to develop new ideas and creativity.
Second, technology provides a variety of tools to express creativity. For example, people can create their songs by using music composition soft on their computers and share them through social media. Regardless of the physical distances with the original composers, other musicians can arrange the songs by adding new parts and corroborating with the artists. Since the internet and technology made it easier to show the artworks in the public, technology created more opportunities for people without formal education of arts to stimulate their creativity.
Third, despite those positive impacts of technology on creativity, heavy reliance on technology harms children. Creating a virtual world, technology separates children from the real world that is crucial for children. Children need hands-on experience to build motor skills and language development through physical activities involving five senses such as sight, touch, smell, sound, and taste. A lack of learning from real worlds can affect children to less understand how physical worlds and nature work. Without much interaction with the real world, children cannot have enough chances to engage in visual and spatial activities that are critical to enhancing multiple parts of brains. For example, while typing seems more convenient than writing on paper by hand by obviating such an onerous task, typing impairs long-term memory retention and deeper understanding. Since children are more vulnerable to those negative effects of technology, it is important to balance between technology and other real-world experiences to foster creativity.
In conclusion, technology paves the way for encouraging creativity by promoting more communications and collaborations with others. While children can benefit from technology to foster creativity, overreliance on technology is no panacea for childhood development. Since they are more at risk of harmful side effects of technology including internet and game addiction, children need to create a healthy balance with technology.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statements Children should not be allowed to play the video games 59
- us wood company eco friendly certification 73
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms offices and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however they also appear as guests on television news programs giving expert commentary on the latest events in 73
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their family for a longer time Which of these solutions do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 66
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do Do you agree or disagree 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74115044248 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95516510914 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526548672566 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0149023764 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.954545455 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223331022238 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790933822995 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402888109413 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14921954563 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443128211264 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 10.9000537634 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.