Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People who are working on the same projects use different ways to communicate with each other. They need to talk about the details of the project to progress. In this vein, some people prefer to contact the teammate, either a classmate or a colleague, using online approaches like e-mail. However, others prefer to talk about the project in person. I, personally, believe that doing a project needs to have a face to face relationship with the coworker, for two conspicuous reasons which I will elaborate on them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, communicate in person makes a sense of community in the group which is conducive to performing the project in a better way. When people are in touch only by e-mail they cannot socialize with each other very well because their conversation is just limited to the project. However, when people who are working on the same project and have the same goal talks face to face, can talk about other subjects and gradually their relationship turns to the friendship that it is beneficial for their progress. To be more specific, in such a situation, when they feel a sense of community in the group, put more effort and energy to do their best because they want to make their friends satisfied and show their commitments to them. Nevertheless, when two coworkers are strange, they do not care about each other and it is highly probable that they postpone their tasks or neglect their responsibilities.
Second, talking in person, people can exchange their idea and reach a compromise properly. If the ones who are doing a project want to communicate only through e-mail, they will deprive themselves of the chance of a productive discussion which can lead to removing all ambiguities and mistakes. Facilities like e-mail are adjusted for instant messaging, therefore they are not a suitable choice to do a project. In such a medium people cannot convey their notion and they are more likely to waste time and energy. To elucidate on, when my friend and I wanted to do a project, we had to use e-mail because she was far away from the university at that time. Every day we spent a great deal of time exchanging our idea and matching the results. It was demanding for both of us, and we gave up the project until she came back to the campus.
In conclusion, with the two mentioned reasons taking into account, I do believe that it is not a good idea to use the e-mail to accomplish a project. In this way, not only do not people get a sense of community in the group, but they also will be exhausted because it is difficult to do a project using instant messaging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | ShayesteTR | 80 | view |
- tpo40 70
- In 20 years from now on students will not use printed books any more 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 73
- tpo61 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 97
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67072981254 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473913043478 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.861081254 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.789473684 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333653471096 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119046068053 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577095066112 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232822961193 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457414030331 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.