F123
Some controversy has been generated about whether or not selling fossils is beneficial. The author states that the public and the scientisits will suffer from selling these percious fossils parts. However, the speaker says that actually selling fossils to the collecters will have significant benefits for both the public and scientists.
The first point of dispute is if selling fossils harms the public. The lecturer explains that this idea of selling fossils will allow people to see fossils more than ever. This is because low-income public institution can purchase and display them to the public. By contrast, the author mentions that the public will suffer from the sale of fossils.
Another controversial issue is about scientists accessibility. According to the professor, the rich people can not buy the fossils unless they arego through several tests and examinations by scientists. Therefore, scientists will have access to fossils. On the other hand, the author posits that selling fossils will reduce the researchers ability to work on fossils.
The final point of debate is the question of the collectors. The speaker claims that if the coolectors do not look for the fossils, they highly likely stayed unknown and unearthed. Thus, collectors should look for them even though if they destroy the evidence that would be found around them. This is because universities and other institutions are no welling to look for these valuable parts. Despite that possible rationale, the author ignores these potential explanations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-20 | Jasmine123 | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...me controversy has been generated about whether or not selling fossils is beneficial. The auth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...ts that selling fossils will reduce the researchers ability to work on fossils. The fin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41493775934 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69262956154 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54356846473 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1450282081 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5625 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0625 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.