The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares the percentage of young people in 4 countries who entered higher education from 2000 to 2010. Overall, the participation rate of young people studying higher education was on the increase in these countries, with the exception of country B. In addition, going into higher education among young people in country D was more popular than those in other countries.
In 2000, 60% of young people in country D participated in university education while the percentage of those in country C coming to university was 10% lower. The participation rate of young people in tertiary education in country A and B was lowest at 40%.
In the next 10 years, the percentage of young people participating in higher education in country D increased suddenly to 80% while a gradual increase of 20% was seen in the figure for country A. In contrast, the participation rate of young people in higher education in country C just grew slightly to over 50% in 2010 whereas there was no change in the percentage of students among young people in country B at 40% during the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 56
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 55
- The bar chart shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...was on the increase in these countries, with the exception of country B. In addition, going into high...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 186.0 315.596192385 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84946236559 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85211886719 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 176.041082164 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467741935484 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 506.74238477 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9395878334 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236175830687 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160673945672 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702471842544 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196837660206 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445811264467 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 78.4519038076 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.