The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the utilization of four sorts of meat such as chicken, beef, lamb and fish as grams per person per week in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
To begin with, it is vivid that the consumption of chicken was constantly fluctuating throughout the aforesaid period and reached at approximately 250 grams from 150 grams in 2009. Additionally, the utilization of beef was around 220 grams in 1979 and then it was slightly varying till 1987. Afterwards, this has been gradually plunged and reached at 100 grams in the end of said period.
Furthermore, the consumption ...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | VuXuan | 61 | view |
| 2015-04-28 | smrn | 80 | view |
| 2014-11-25 | inder.mann07@gmail.com | 95 | view |
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparsions where relevant. 55
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel to other cultures Others say that books films and the internet can be used as a source of information about different cultures Do u agree or disagree Give your opinion 63
- Nowadays online shopping becomes more popular than store shopping Is it a positive or negative development Give your opinion and relevant example 86
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 45
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 191 200
No. of Characters: 892 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.718 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.67 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.649 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.533 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.499 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.737 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4