The graph illustrates the amount of fish and different kinds of meat intaken by European people in 1979 and 2004 period.
Overall, the consumption of beef and lamb decreased ever the period given, while for chicken it rose, and stayed pretty stable for fish. At the start, beef was the most popular kind of meat, which was reploled by chicken since 1989.
The amount of beef used started from ever two hundred grams por person in 1979, then it fluctuated until 1989, and significantly decreased to around 100 grams per person per week in 2004. Likewise, approximately 150 grams of chicken and lamb were eaten in the first year after which the first product steadily increased up to 250 grams, while the second gradually declined to almost 50 grams in 2004.
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDiscuss both the 78
- More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel into work every day. The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment. What measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, second, so, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 630.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 131.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80916030534 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38312328216 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3535974124 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648854961832 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 173.7 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2064809953 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140825430743 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923328841266 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104882336696 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136421489119 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116920354544 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.