Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today’s world, the question, “ How to go from one place to another place efficiently?”, has greatly affected humans’ life. In other words, people are always looking for a way to move faster than they did in the past, and they are also considering “nature-friendly” factors. In this regard, there is an idea which says, in the future, the number of cars which we use will reduce significantly. Personally, I subscribe to this idea and I believe that for various reasons we will use fewer cars in next twenty years. Two most conspicuous of these reasons are elaborated upon in the following paragraphs.
First of all, protecting nature is one of the most important concerns among people of the world. In better words, people, especially the youth, are doing their best in order to protect nature and their environment against harmful activities and policies. With this in mind, more people tend to refrain from using cars, one of the most widespread sources destroying nature. As a matter of fact, if we take a glance at many countries, we can see that quite a few people prefer to use bikes instead of car as means of going to their work. Moreover, schools are trying to teach students to protect their nature so as to when they grow up they will try to preserve nature, which implies that future generations will have "nature-protecting" habits, one of which is not using cars. Therefore, people not only will use cars less but also will buy cars less, resulting in fewer number of cars in the future.
Second, as far as travelling is concerned, people are always looking for a way which is faster and can let them save more time. In this regard, as societies improve, people change their transportation system. For instance, if we take a look at history, in the past people tended to use horses, while, after a few years, they tended to use cars, which were faster in comparison with horses. Thus, although cars are on of the fastest ways to travel at the present, they might be outshined by faster and newer ways which will emerge in the future. Additionally, even at the present, various ways such as airplanes and fast trains, which are faster than cars, are becoming more popular among people, and governments are also trying to develop these ways in order to make their country improvement faster. With all this taken into account, it is clearly predictable that cars technology is going to become slow and out-of-dated as compared to new ways, thereby leading to reduction of cars in the next years.
In conclusion, according to the mentioned reasons, it is axiomatic that the number of cars is going to decrease drastically, since human beings are trying to protect nature for next generations and make their travelling faster. I wish that, one day, people from all nations stop using cars and protect the Earth against their harmful activities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... considering “nature-friendly” factors. In this regard, there is an idea which say...
^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... teach students to protect their nature so as to when they grow up they will try to pres...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...on with horses. Thus, although cars are on of the fastest ways to travel at the pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87267360847 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490872210953 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.336980783 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.157894737 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9473684211 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189529810366 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659849773335 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582893873521 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127825904737 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433912992949 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... considering “nature-friendly” factors. In this regard, there is an idea which say...
^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... teach students to protect their nature so as to when they grow up they will try to pres...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...on with horses. Thus, although cars are on of the fastest ways to travel at the pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87267360847 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490872210953 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.336980783 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.157894737 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9473684211 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189529810366 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659849773335 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582893873521 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127825904737 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433912992949 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.