Education is considered as the basic of a country’s development. Many propose that government should allocate national’s budget to all levels of education. However, from my perspective, this is not a beneficial decision.
Firstly, it is noteworthy that the payment of governments for the cost of both primary and higher education could bring an economic burden for a country. In fact, lawmakers nowadays have to combat with much more serious problems such as: poverty, starvation, pollution or even terrorism and lack of healthcare services. Therefore, money should be spent reasonably to certain essential sectors.
Secondly, another fact that should be taken into account is that the government’s financial aid can discourage students from pursuing further education. The counter-argument raised by objectors is that free education for higher levels plays a crucial part in opening opportunities for all kinds of students to acquire intensive knowledge. This justification is probably true to some extent, nevertheless it should be acknowledged that students may take this as privilege as a citizen and lose their eagerness if they don’t have to pay for classes. Take America for example: since young adults have to earn money for their study, they need to stay focused in order to pass the tests. The more absence they are marked, the higher chance they have to study that class again.
However, a country’s budget should be allocated to tackle illiteracy by funding primary and secondary school. It is not only raising better human resources but also investing for the future’s economy.
To sum up, under no circumstances should governments overlook the efficiency in spending money on education
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram presents the process of producing smoked fish 79
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summerize the information by selecting 56
- The diagram presents the process of producing smoked fish 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42696629213 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02419556456 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632958801498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.625425168 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24320626479 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783388469602 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492845200964 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132173790735 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364978813168 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.