This diagram shows the different steps involved in the making of a matchstick.
Overall, the process of making matches includes steps like peeling, chopping, preparation, drying, storing, chemical treatment and then packaging.
At first, the log of wood is peeled using a peeler until a thin layer of sheet come out, called veneer. The chopper cuts these thin layers sheets into small sticks which are later soaked in ammonium phosphate tank. The sticks are placed in a circular dyer and rotated in a rotating drum. Afterwards, they are dumped in a hopper and pushed through the metal duct by a blower.
In the next stage, the matchsticks are gathered in a storage area from where they are arranged in a funnel. These matchsticks are inserted on to a perforated steel belt. As the belts move along, the tips of the matchsticks are dipped in a series of three tanks containing components such as paraffin wax, based chemicals, tip chemicals. Next, the belts loop up and down through a drying area. In the final step of the process, the matches are packaged.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 50
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The two maps below show the Paradise island in the past and in the present 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87845303867 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.588054306 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651933701657 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4114626299 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2727272727 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129610158344 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477949421868 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633517693968 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960045080613 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654867338734 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.