Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Because great achievements by a nation’s rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure good life for the majority of that nation’s people, achievements of them are the surest indicator of a great nation. Even though rulers, artists, and scientists represent a relatively smaller segment of overall population, their achievements have mammoth potential to impact virtually every denizen of that nation.
First and foremost, a nation’s rulers shape the plans and policies that are determinant of the general direction the nation is headed towards in terms of development goals, well-being of society, upliftment of its citizens, measures to check penury, etc. Propitious decisions that rulers make can and will ensure a good life for the majority of its people. I’ll exemplify my point with an event from history. During the 1950s, after independence, India was suffering from numerous ills with poverty and hunger being of paramount importance. Then Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru started Green Revolution, bunch of policies and initiatives auspicious to farmers and agriculture in general, to combat hunger, poverty and reduce India’s dependence on other nations for staple crops. That 10 year-long revolution greatly mitigated primal problems and made India self-sufficient in wheat, rice agricultural production necessary to meet it’s large population. And, this is just one example, history is filled with plethora of such great examples.
Secondly, scientists’ achievements have also influenced every citizen's life, one way or other. From advancements in technology making our lives easier and better to medical advancements that have vastly improved the life expectancy of people, the role of scientists in ensuring a good life can’t be disputed. From complete eradication of smallpox, a deathly disease with high mortality rate, to near eradication of polio, a disabling and life-threatening disease affecting nervous system of humans, is very much because of great works done by our medical scientists.
Thirdly, I would also like to say that artists also play a pivotal role in the overall well-being of people. Arts help connect with people in quite a unique way and also inspire appreciation for the society and nature we live in. It is mostly related to emotional and mental well-being of people which is of crucial importance in today’s world of ever-increasing stress and hectic life.
However, I would like to say that a certain prominent fields are left out, namely, teachers and business persons. No one can deny the role of teachers and education in one’s life, be it scientist, an artist or a ruler. Also, business persons help employ a number of people and contribute substantially towards the nation’s economy.
In conclusion, I would like to say that addition of a couple of left-out fields and professions can greatly reinforce the author’s reasoning, and consequently, the claim made.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-14 | Ankit0399 | 50 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | zfron | 66 | view |
| 2020-08-25 | Pranali11 | 50 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | batol70455@farmdeu.com | 83 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | manveerkaur | 58 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree with the topic 80
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 60
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 83
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers havetherefore suggested that R 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 938, Rule ID: ITS_JJ_NNSNN[27]
Message: Did you mean 'its large population'?
Suggestion: its large population
...ricultural production necessary to meet it’s large population. And, this is just one example, history...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...achievements have also influenced every citizens life, one way or other. From advancemen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 55, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'field'?
Suggestion: field
...ld like to say that a certain prominent fields are left out, namely, teachers and busi...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I would like to say that addition of a couple of left-out fields and profession...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47912087912 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01363964504 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2435500162 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.210526316 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408640990993 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107647601938 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127361471251 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183082965962 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128780147352 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.