kouryaku
In the biology class, the lecturer challenged the article about the benefits of flaxseed.
Firstly, the reading passage argued that flaxseed is beneficial to our health in that it contains sufficient fiber which can aid our digestion system. However, the lecturer cast doubt on the opinion, telling us the risk of overtaking it. According to her, too much fiber may destroy the appropriate bowel function, causing us to go to the bathroom more often.
Another problem the lecturer pointed out was that its benefit is still suspicious. The reading passage referred to the antioxidants flaxseed has as inhibitors of developing some major diseases. On the other hand, the lecturer concluded that their contribution to our health is still under research and nothing conclusive cannot be asserted.
The lecturer also mentioned the fact that flaxseed is not well known to general public and its safety is yet to be revealed. In conclusion, she disagreed to the idea that flaxseed might be helpful to our health condition in terms of appropriate intake, effectiveness, and safety. She concluded that relying on one ingredient for the resources of sufficient nutritions is harmful.
- TOEFLiBT
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 66
- Some people like to travel with a companion Other people prefer to travel alone Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'antioxidants'' or 'antioxidant's'?
Suggestion: antioxidants'; antioxidant's
...us. The reading passage referred to the antioxidants flaxseed has as inhibitors of developin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...fact that flaxseed is not well known to general public and its safety is yet to be revealed. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, so, still, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 1977.66487455 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 188.0 407.700716846 46% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29255319149 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.48103885553 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8538560081 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 212.727598566 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61170212766 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 618.680645161 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8822332885 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.