The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given chart reveals the information regarding the number of people(in thousands) who purchased tickets for different events held at respective venues in the year 2009. The table details the cost of each event in dollars.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that most of the people preferred visiting a cinema as compared to sports, and theme parks. Also, among all the sports events, Football was the costliest one.

According to the given illustration, whilst more than a million people chose cinema, nearly one-fourth of that selected to go to the theme park, and merely 1 50 000 people went to attend a sports event.

Turning to the price list, Football games at different locations ranged between $71 to $75 for a single attendee, and just below four times the single ticket for a group of 4 people. Theme parks also charged almost a similar cost of $70 for a ticket, but on the other hand family ticket for the same offered a concession equivalent to one full ticket. In sport section, tickets for baseball and cricket were to the lower end of just $34 and $24 respectively. However, cinemas quoted the least price of only $15(single), and $55(family of 4).

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...merely 1 50 000 people went to attend a sports event. Turning to the price list, Fo...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57981026278 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651960784314 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5779844083 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925396549791 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345714404079 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550053046975 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560480437863 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551352085659 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.