Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.
Nowadays, the acquisition of learning and being well educated has an unavoidable impact on every individual's life. Hence, it is totally natural for parents to care about their children's educational progress and get involved in the process. In this way, I believe that contemporary parents are more active than the past ones for some specific reasons which I will mention in the following essay.
To begin with, due to the advent of the modern educational system, parents are obligated to get involved in their children's educational life and this can be pretended as something mandatory. Today, almost all schools want parents to join different clubs, groups, and seminars held by the school and know more about educational systems, the rules, and laws that must be followed by both the parents and children. Additionally, schools require parents to engage with the educational status of their children to help the school in order to propel students to achieve their goals and improve their social and educational life.
Finally, yet importantly, coexistent parents are totally cognizant of the importance of being well-educated in this era of technology. To demonstrate this fact, my grandparents were not educated at all and their lives were not affected by the fast growth of technology and the internet and they were totally capable of continuing their lives without having a high level of studies. However, after the pace growth of science and technology and getting aware of the impact of studies on their children's lives, they encouraged our parents to become educated, but they were not able to help them in their studies. For this reason, the next generation started to care more about education and studies and they are more likely to engage with what is going on in their children's lives.
In conclusion, I believe that concurrent parents are more associated with their children's education than the past parents because firstly, they are asked to be so by the schools, and secondly, they know the crucial impact that education has on the ongoing life of the existing generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-14 | joyce05 | 60 | view |
| 2022-03-24 | Kinga Wangmo | 68 | view |
| 2021-09-12 | ambition kasra | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-12 | ambition kasra | 76 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | mahi22 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- TPO 27-Independent 3
- TPO 30 integrated writing 70
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than to older people. 70
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp fishing boats When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe and they die Some people suggest that this p 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ated has an unavoidable impact on every individuals life. Hence, it is totally natural for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13450292398 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7158942412 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502923976608 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6018885373 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.636363636 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0909090909 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429438035501 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178985968678 0.076458572812 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709020805703 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286236537847 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415094601304 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.