For career development people are required to learn and apply various types of skills at work. While speaking in public is an important talent, it cannot be accounted as the most significant feature.
Turning to the importance of public speaking, it certainly is paramount for some occupations where a mass of population is involved such as political leaders. Otherwise, they will probably lose their people’s support, however, there are mundane jobs like clerical or waiters and waitresses and prestigious ones like medicinal doctors and university lectures who are not expected to be a genius in this regard.
On the contrary, there are huge numbers of skills that inadequacy in any of them will cause insurmountable harm to further the career. First and foremost, is qualifications and experience. Career progression of a well-rounded person has a brighter prospective. Many companies are possibly willing to tolerate even bad-tempered and unpunctual but knowledgeable and ambidextrous workers solely they need them. The second important factor is people skills. For instance, assertiveness which means the ability to communicate with people and express your ideas and feeling in well-mannered approaches. Assertive people act like a magnet which potentially can cultivate the land for growing cooperative and positive attitude. This in turn, with high possibility, fosters a sense of belonging, enthusiasm and loyalty to the company besides the benefits of more diligent workers.
The third skill is reasoning and analytical skills. With the ever-increasing complexity of state-of-the- art technologies, and growing number of competitors, the skills provide us in-depth tangible and measurable facts which are absolutely required to make profits and sustain in the short and long term.
In summary, while being a genius in public speaking is adorable character and is indispensable part of some jobs, there are more contributing factors in career fulfillment. Among these public speaking stands fourth after qualifications, people skills and analytical reasoning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-17 | aghaei.arsalan | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste and what solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 81
- Some people feel that the exploration of space justifies a large amount of government and private investment Other people think that this field is of increasingly low relevance and should not be a priority Debate both sides of this discussion and explain 92
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write How far do you agree with this suggestion How important is it for a child to learn to play a musical instrument in your view 56
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctors in career fulfillment. Among these public speaking stands fourth after qual...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, well, while, for instance, in summary, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73381294964 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24146827979 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658273381295 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6459034063 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185012847885 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580000327606 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044220680743 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10751066443 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523021036271 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.