International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is argued that tourism industry is accompanied by both beneficial and harmful effects on the tourist destinations. I understand the negative impacts in the meantime, I support the plus side of the industry certainly supersedes the negative impacts.
On the one hand, anti-tourists industry offer varieties of reasons from cultural, economic, political and environmental aspects. Firstly, the opponents believe since visitors typically are from more developed countries, their cultural values may be admired and copied by the local people. This may lead to disappearance of local traditions in the long run or disintegration of social fabric of the local people. As a result it may cause instability and political unrest later. Secondly, the visitors litter in the environment polluting the local habitats nevertheless it is the local people who suffer from the pollution. Thirdly, the arrival of visitors increases the prices of food and home in the local area during the high seasons because the service providers tend to offer the resources to affluent customers which will deprive the local people from having their normal life.
On the other hand, tourists spend more money than the local which encourages entrepreneurs to create more job opportunities which is in benefits of the locals this will boost the life perspective in poorer places and possibly discourages emigrations besides improving the life quality of the local in the long terms. In addition to that, the cultural interaction in not just negative, but it can also generate a melting pot of cultural values and fortify the local culture though increasing the sense of unity and may provide a harmonious life in the future.
In conclusion, my view is that tourism is far more beneficiary than harmful and has the potential to improve the local lives while the negative influence is negligible.
- Some people feel that the exploration of space justifies a large amount of government and private investment Other people think that this field is of increasingly low relevance and should not be a priority Debate both sides of this discussion and explain 92
- ldhldsdl 84
- Light pollution excessive light during night time is a form of pollution that distresses many people especially in modern cities What are the causes of light pollution and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take 65
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In many countries truancy is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30588235294 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01738140481 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580392156863 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4341159948 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.3 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 7.06120827912 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108169372011 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411333577782 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255060703763 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636342186578 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00532125907917 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.